Saturday, January 31, 2015

The Clearest Explanation On Money And The Law Of Attraction!

By  January 31, 20150 CommentsRead More →
Video - Watch how Stuart Wilde, an author, lecturer, and one of the real characters of the self-help/human-potential movement talk about The Law of Attraction.
Also known as the law of “Reaping and Sowing”, The Law of Attraction simply states, whatever you give out in Thought, Word, Feeling, and Action is returned to you. Whether the return is negative, or positive, failure or success, is all up to what you give out. Many authors and celebrities such as Wayne Dyer, Oprah Winfrey, Will Smith, Jim Carrey, Steve Harvey, Rhonda Byrne, and many others have testified to this amazing Law Of Attraction. It’s time you learn this wonderful secret…
Stuart Wilde has written 15 books, including the very successful Taos Quintet, which are considered classics in their genre. In his latest release, God’s Gladiators, he challenges us like never before. He has also had a big effect on the movement for greater awareness. Over a period of twenty years, he came to be known as ‘the teacher’s teacher’ because of the influence he has had on other writers and lecturers in the field.

Leading Scientists, Physicians and Politicians Expose GMO Dangers

By  January 31, 20150 CommentsRead More →

Waking Times

Documentary Film - The world’s leading scientists, physicians, attorneys, politicians and environmental activists expose the corruption and dangers surrounding the widespread use of Genetically Modified Organisms in this full-length documentary, “Seeds of Death: Unveiling the Lies of GMO’s.”
To learn more about GMO dangers, CLICK HERE.

How Important is Vitamin D?

How Important is Vitamin D?
Vitamin D has several important functions. Perhaps the most vital are regulating the absorption of calcium and phosphorous, and facilitating normal immune system function. Getting a sufficient amount of the vitamin is important for normal growth and development of bones and teeth, as well as improved resistance against certain diseases.

Research suggests that vitamin D could play a role in the prevention and treatment of a number of different conditions, including type1 and type 2 diabetes, hypertension, glucose intolerance, and multiple sclerosis.


If your body doesn’t get enough vitamin D, you’re at risk of developing bone abnormalities such as osteomalacia (soft bones) or osteoporosis (fragile bones).


You've got the blues. Vitamin D seems to improve levels of the neurotransmitter serotonin, says Holick, which in turn could lift your spirits. In a small 1998 study, healthy people given vitamin D supplements during the winter reported greater positive feelings than people given no D. However, a larger study in women over 70 found no significant mental health benefit.


Causes of Vitamin D Deficiency...

Your kidneys cannot convert vitamin D to its active form. As people age, their kidneys are less able to convert vitamin D to its active form, thus increasing their risk of vitamin D deficiency.
Your digestive tract cannot adequately absorb vitamin D. Certain medical problems, including Crohn's disease, cystic fibrosis, and celiac disease, can affect your intestine's ability to absorb vitamin D from the food you eat.
You are obese. Vitamin D is extracted from the blood by fat cells, altering its release into the circulation. People with a body mass index of 30 or greater often have low blood levels of vitamin D.



Friday, January 30, 2015

If you have a glimmer of interest in Nutrition, Health, or Food, I am asking you to keep reading

This is a company that is on the leading edge of Food and Nutrition that happened to decide to distribute their products through real people, not mega stores like Wal-Mart, Sam's, Costco or Corporate distribution centers that supply grocery stores.

 
If you are uncomfortable buying healthy, nutritious real foods through people you know or don't know, but you would prefer to buy unhealthy products from people you don't know, I would like to say I understand but I do not. I don't judge you for this, I just don't comprehend the logic.
 
If you have a glimmer of interest in Nutrition, Health, or Food, I am asking, no begging you to look into yevo43.com. There are 3 days left to be a founding distributor for Yevo International. This opportunity will be gone after February 1st. I will say this one more time, Peter Castelman is a Billionaire and he is asking for our help to grow a company who's mission is to, "Improve the Lives of All People Through Good Nutrition". That's it! God Bless you and God Bless Innovators. ‪#‎tesla‬ ‪#‎stevejobs‬ ‪#‎yevo‬ ‪#‎mlk‬ ‪#‎davinci‬ ‪#‎johnlennon‬ ‪#‎brucelipton








Thursday, January 29, 2015

A World Designed For Freedom


“There is enough on earth for everyone’s need, but not for everyone’s greed” – Gandhi
Humanity is sold on the concept that a form of authority has the right to own natural resources, and can create a system that allows them to decide who can or cannot have access to them. According to this system, The degree of access that each human being can have to even the most vital resources, will depend on how hard they are willing to work to gain what we call “money“. This is indeed a wide spread belief, but once we look at it from an observer’s standpoint, does it have to be this way? Is there any wisdom to an economic system where 20% of the population consumes 80% of the earth’s resources, while the other 80% of the population gets by on the remaining 20%?
For many humans, the ownership, control and the unequal distribution of resources is simply common sense. This belief originates from the subconscious sense that there will never be enough space, opportunity and resource in the world for everybody to benefit from. Such an impression has made the idea of scarcity, ruthless competition, winners and losers a reality amongst the human race. One where you must “earn” your spot in the world, hold on to it, own it, protect it… and ideally profit from it regardless of the harm it may cause along the way. This concoction of beliefs, mentalities and concepts has formed a thick veil of illusion over one of mother nature’s very simple truths:
Planet earth produces more than enough resources for all earthlings to share equally.
The fact of the matter is, not one human being actually HAS to experience lack. For lack to be even possible, there has to be a minority of humans that not only consume more than the rest, but also call the shots on who gets what.
“It is as if children are playing in a sandbox full of toys. One of them decides that the toys are his, and then tells the other kids that they must work to get these little pieces of paper that will grant them access to the toys.” – Franco DeNicola
As silly as the previous analogy sounds, this is exactly what we are doing, but in a much grander scale.
It is simple mathematics really: A human race living in a state of sustainability + unity + peace + equality + cooperation = A healthy and flourishing earth where everybody shares and no one experiences lack. A human race living in a state of dependency + separation + destruction + hierarchy + greed = An unhealthy and damaged earth where the rich get richer and the poor stay poor.
We have all heard the sayings, “money is the root of all evil”, or “money makes the world go round,” both implying money as that which has brought humanity to this point. Money sure does seem to be the root cause of most of humanity’s unconscious actions. But is it really?
We seem to perceive money as this outside force that overrules and dictates every individual and collective step that we make, as if it is more powerful than all of us combined. Yet, when you think about it, money is not a natural phenomena that we had no choice but to work with. It is completely fabricated. It is a man-made invention, that only has as much value as our minds can give to pieces of paper and digits on a computer.
How could money itself be evil and responsible for the world going round? Could a simple digit on a computer or piece of paper decide to be the most valuable thing, create wars, represent natural resources, or forbid these resources to be shared equally? Of course not. Only the mind of an individual can do so. The value and role of money lies only in the eyes of the beholder, and this is precisely why the system insists in portraying it as so vital, so valuable, and even fashionable, through both the media and education.
Picture yourself in a child-like state, having not been exposed to all society’s influences and belief systems. Would anyones inner-child go to war with another earthling, destroy the planet in the name of pieces of paper and digits on a computer, or be too greedy to desire a world in which we all share the planet’s resources equally?
“The mass propaganda of carefully concocted beliefs and concepts has now overruled the simple and obvious truth of living together as equals, in abundance, in honesty, in peace and in harmony. Yet no matter how much those manipulative concepts and beliefs have tainted the vision of humanity, the truth remains the truth.” – E.S.
The concept of a form of currency may have served at one point in time as a means of exchange and barter, but does that servitude still exist when humanity becomes enslaved by it? Is it even truly serving when it has transformed into a prison of perpetual debt which enriches the richest and further deprives the poorest? Is it worth keeping when the masses are now are obligated to pay simply to exist and survive on the abundant planet we were born on, all while the few in charge of such a system can simply print money out of thin air, bathe in unnecessary luxury, and still call the shots?
No.
Money is now archaic, and there is always room for evolution.
“We are about to do what centuries of human beings have not been able to do. And that is to get the big picture, and realize that we are all one. No matter how much we disagree, you are my brother, you are my sister, and there is nothing we can do to change that. We have to figure out how to live together. And in reality, we can live together. We can! It is ridiculous to think we can’t. In fact, we have to really work hard at not learning to live together.” – Alex Collier
We are limitless creators in a limitless world, and our only limits are the ones we create and impose on ourselves. It is time to let go of the old, shift our consciousness, and co-create something new!
Much Love,
Elina

Why Do We Care So Much About What Others Think?

by . 2 Comments.
self
At some point or another we’ve all worried about what someone else is going to think of something we do or say, to the point that it almost seems like a natural part of our psyche. The truth is though, we think this way because we get caught up in our heads worrying and wondering what possible scenarios may play out if we do or say something that others won’t accept.

Our mind chatter is plentiful in these cases due to years of social and cultural conditioning regarding our lifestyles, appearance, cultural norms, and so on. We are basically told what is going to be accepted and what isn’t as we progress through our younger years, ultimately creating a filter in our own minds that all of our thoughts and actions pass through prior to action.

This can also be called self-consciousness and it happens to each of us in many forms and to many degrees of intensity.  The good news is, our mind/ego is the entity within us that plays with self-consciousness, and the more our true selves or the true “I” can become aware of these tricky thoughts, the less power they have over us.

In our latest episode of ‘These Guys’ we talk about this topic in-depth and provide some thoughts on how to overcome the challenges associated with it. Check it out!

Summary of Points

  • Our self-consciousness holds us back from experiencing true freedom and expressing our true selves in fear of what others will think.
  • We often do things in life simply because we are looking for validation from other people to make ourselves feel good. Our search for happiness and peace then becomes out of our control and reliant on people and things outside of ourselves.
  • Reflect on what you do on social media, are you doing what you do to get validation from others? How do you feel when it’s not received so well by others?
  • We allow others to shape who we are based on how we think they will perceive us.
  • Solution: Ask yourself why you are doing certain things before you do them when it comes to what can relate to your self-consciousness. Are you doing it for validation? Are you doing it because you’re afraid of what people will think if you did something different? Are you trying to be over-confident and forcing it? The more you reflect on what motivates your behaviour, the more you will understand yourself and will move beyond the need to do things (or not do things) because of what others think.
  • Will Smith knows…

According to the most recent American Diabetes Association report, 29.1 million Americans are diabetic

(NaturalNews) According to the most recent American Diabetes Association report, 29.1 million Americans are diabetic. Additionally, the disease still held the rank of being the seventh leading cause of death in the United States. Over 8 million of that 29.1 are undiagnosed, unaware that they have the condition.(1)

Therefore, it's wise for everyone to take a closer look at their dietary lifestyle and eat foods that help fight diabetes.
diabetes

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/048442_diabetes_herbal_medicine_spices.html#ixzz3QETDWc9C

Wednesday, January 28, 2015

We are “Founding Distributors” for YEVO!

We are “Founding Distributors” in YEVO. Have you ever been first before? Have you ever joined something before it even launched? You can be part of the Founding Distributors too. Have you truly grasped how unique that position could be? If you are concerned about joining a Network Marketing company, you are not alone. We know how you feel, we felt the same way. What we found is, we were totally off base. The support and abundance and caring and sharing is amazing. Law... of Attraction is at work here! 43essentials.myyevo.com for ordering or information on selling


YEVO Pre-Launch Video


 
Many people who are doing well in other Network Marketing companies often ask themselves the question, “How much better would I be doing now if I had joined one or two years earlier?”
You don’t have to ask yourself that question. You have the first mover advantage. You can't join any earlier than this! This is the timing that Network Marketing Professionals dream of. You have that dream in your possession – right now!


If you know someone that represents different companies they make help you identify people to enroll in YEVO early also, please make the most of that. If those companies are causing a temporary distraction during this time of initial building in YEVO, I would encourage you to put them on the back burner for now. What might be an ordinary time period in the other companies you represent, is an extraordinary time period in YEVO that will never occur again in the company’s history.




You can be the FIRST in YEVO. Make sure that you take full advantage of it! Just get on board before it launches. It's only $50.00. Become a Founding Distributor. We are set to launch February 2, 2015.



What's so special about Yevo Foods?

YEVO foods are healthy versions of packaged goods we typically find in the center aisles of the grocery store - the toxic wasteland we've been told to avoid at all costs.  YEVO foods are not just healthy alternatives, but they are the delivery mechanism for the 43 Essential Nutrients that our bodies need for cellular and overall health - to fight off illness, disease, premature aging and early death.
Our foods are minimally processed using proprietary no/low temp means that retains nutrient values, unlike the "Big Food" approach of highly-refining ingredients and totally nuking nutrients.
Ultimately, YEVO is the "43 Essential Nutrients" company, which happens to use great-tasting foods to deliver the nutrients in a more bio-available and convenient form.
Posted by Yevo.us Click for more information

United States of Diabesity

Obesity in America

Reposted by Yevo.us


Apr12_Diabesity
One in two Americans is suffering from diabesity, and most of them don’t even know it. Why? Because most doctors are not trained to treat the single biggest chronic disease in America. The good news? Diabesity can be prevented, treated and reversed. Dr. Mark Hyman explains how.
It is no secret that we are in the middle of an explosive epidemic of obesity and type 2 diabetes, or what I call “diabesity.” As a physician, scientist, educator and citizen, I have been motivated to find a comprehensive solution. That is what spurred me to write my new book, The Blood Sugar Solution: The UltraHealthy Program for Losing Weight, Preventing Disease, and Feeling Great Now! (Little, Brown and Company, 2012).
What I’ve discovered in my more than 20 years of seeing patients is that whether you are suffering from a little extra weight around the middle or you have been diagnosed with insulin resistance, pre-diabetes, metabolic syndrome, Syndrome X or even type 2 diabetes, all of these conditions are basically the same thing — just with varying degrees of severity.
A new word, “diabesity,” describes this continuum of metabolic imbalance and disease that ranges all the way from mild blood-sugar imbalance to insulin resistance to full-blown diabetes. So, yes, if you have diabetes, you have diabesity. But you don’t have to be a diabetic — or even have symptoms — to be suffering from diabesity.
Nearly all people who are overweight (almost 70 percent of Americans) already have “pre-diabetes,” which, in short, is an earlier stage of diabesity that carries with it significant risks of disease and death. And, although the word diabesity is made up of the concepts of obesity and diabetes, even those who aren’t overweight can have this problem. These are the “skinny fat” people. They are “under lean” (not enough muscle) instead of “overweight” and often carry a little extra weight around the middle.
Diabesity is a leading cause of most chronic disease in the 21st century. Specifically, those with diabesity are at an increased risk of heart disease, stroke, dementia, cancer, high blood pressure, blindness and kidney failure.
Unfortunately, most people who are suffering from diabesity have no idea that they are suffering from a deadly condition — or that this condition is 100 percent reversible. That’s because, currently, there are no national screening recommendations, no treatment guidelines, no approved medications, and no reimbursement to healthcare providers for diagnosing and treating anything other than full-blown diabetes.
Think about that: Doctors are not expected, trained or paid to diagnose and treat the single biggest chronic disease in America — a disease that, along with smoking, causes nearly all the major healthcare burdens of the 21st century.
So this is a very real and very serious problem — not just for those who suffer from diabesity, but for our communities, our economy, our entire society.
Given all of this, one would think the burning questions on everyone’s mind would be: Why is this happening? What has caused this diabesity epidemic? Why are our current approaches to treating the problem failing so miserably? And what new approaches could we take that would more effectively treat the problem?
In fact, not nearly enough people are asking those questions. But if you’re interested, keep reading: I’ll answer them here.

Insulin Resistance: The Real Cause of Diabesity

While there are some predisposing genes, type 2 diabetes is almost entirely induced by environmental and lifestyle factors. Therefore, a search for the diabetes gene and the magic-bullet drug or gene therapy to treat it will lead us nowhere. While understanding our genes can help us personalize our approach to metabolism and weight loss, it can also shift our focus away from the most important target: the modifiable lifestyle and environmental factors that are driving this epidemic.
Take one of the most important lifestyle factors: nutrition and how you eat. When your diet is full of empty calories and an abundance of quickly absorbed sugars, liquid calories (sodas, juices, sports drinks or vitamin waters), and refined or starchy carbohydrates (bread, pasta, rice and potatoes), your cells slowly become numb to the effects of insulin, and need more and more of it to balance your blood-sugar levels. This problem is known as insulin resistance.
A high insulin level is the first sign of trouble. The higher your insulin levels are, the worse your insulin resistance.
Hypoglycemia, or low blood sugar, is often an early symptom of insulin resistance. If you skip meals or eat too much sugar or too many refined carbs, you will experience swings in blood sugar that make you feel anxious, irritable and tired, and that can even cause palpitations and panic attacks. Stuffing down a big cinnamon bun or swigging a 20-ounce soda will cause big spikes in sugar and insulin and a quick surge in energy, followed by the inevitable crash as your blood sugar plummets.
Eventually your cells become so resistant to insulin that your blood sugar stays up and your pancreas can’t produce enough insulin to fight against the high blood sugar and get a message through your numb cells. That’s when you cross the line to diabetes.
The problem? Most doctors don’t catch diabetes in the early stages because they never test insulin levels. Instead, doctors typically measure a person’s fasting blood sugar — the level of glucose present in a blood sample drawn a minimum of eight hours after the last meal.
A recent study showed that anyone with a fasting blood sugar of over 87 mg/dl was at increased risk of diabetes. Yet most doctors are not concerned until the blood sugar is over 110 mg/dl or, worse, 126 mg/dl, the level that technically signals diabetes.
Unfortunately, diagnosing problems with insulin resistance and blood-sugar control at this point occurs too late in the game. In fact, your blood sugar is the last thing to go up. Your insulin spikes first, and despite being the simplest way to detect problems early, doctors rarely order the two-hour glucose tolerance test, which measures not only glucose but also insulin levels at fasting, and one and two hours after a sugar drink — a much more effective way to catch problems before the onset of disease.
Insulin resistance is the single most important phenomenon that leads to rapid and premature aging and all its resultant diseases. High levels of insulin, the fat-storage hormone, tell your body to lose muscle and gain weight around the belly, and you become more apple-shaped over time. High insulin levels also drive inflammation and oxidative stress, and myriad downstream effects including high blood pressure; high cholesterol; poor sex drive, infertility; and increased risk of cancer, Alzheimer’s and depression.
I recommend early testing for anyone who has a family history of type 2 diabetes, belly fat or increased waist size, or abnormal cholesterol. Don’t wait until your sugar is high. By then, too much damage has been done. Even if you have perfectly normal blood sugar, you may still be sitting on this time-bomb disease called diabesity, which prevents you from losing weight and living a long, healthy life.
Keep in mind: Insulin resistance is the major cause of aging and death in the developed (and most of the developing) world.

Lifestyle Measures (Not Drugs) Are the Cure

Most of us are taught that diabetes is not reversible and that we are destined to suffer progressive decline. We also believe that it is nearly impossible to treat obesity or to be able to maintain long-term weight loss. We think that the only treatment options are to limit the consequences and reduce the complications. But my clinical experience tells me none of this is true.
Although the statistics are grave, diabesity can be prevented, treated and reversed. New and better drugs or procedures are not the solution, though. Blockbuster drugs like Avandia fail in their promise and often cause harm. Gastric bypass surgery has increased from 10,000 to 200,000 per year in the last decade. But how many of the 1.7 billion overweight citizens of the world can undergo gastric bypass? And how many of those will gain back most of the weight they lost?
Our current problem-solving tools, methods of diagnosis and ways of treating patients are still based on 19th- and 20th-century ideas about the origins of disease. They overlook the complex web of biology, as well as the social, political and economic conditions at the root of our current chronic-disease epidemic.
Chronic disease results from imbalances in our biology that occur as a result of the interactions between our genes and our environment. To reverse it, we first must focus on the causes (poor diet, stress, toxins, microbes, infections) that disturb our whole system. We must work with the network of our biological systems that become imbalanced because of the effects of the environment in which we live. We must use a new map to navigate chronic disease, one that is based on a new model of treating chronic illness.
This map is called “functional medicine.” It is a way of treating the causes, not just the risk factors; of treating the whole system, not just the symptoms; of creating health, not just treating disease.
In fact, if you focus on creating health rather than just treating disease, many diseases — even complex ones like diabesity — often take care of themselves. Simply put, disease goes away as a side effect of getting healthy.

The Truth About Artificial Food Colorings

Reposted by Yevo.us or 43essentials.myyevo.com for more information on Nutrient Dense Foods



The Truth About Artificial Food Colorings
European countries require warning labels on foods containing certain dyes. Why isn’t the Food and Drug Administration doing the same?
Food blogger Vani Hari (a.k.a. the Food Babe) is not a big fan of the artificial dyes that permeate such items as flavored yogurt, canned white frosting, and grocery-store meats. So, when she discovered that many food manufacturers use only natural dyes in the European versions of their products, she decided to take action.
“I felt like there was injustice in the way food companies are producing safer, better products overseas than here in America,” she says. “It’s a double standard.”
Kraft, for instance, doesn’t use artificial food dyes in its Macaroni & Cheese Dinners in other countries, such as the United Kingdom. Upset by the discrepancy, Hari collected more than 350,000 signatures on a Change.org petition, launched in March 2013, to compel the company to take Yellow No. 5 and Yellow No. 6 out of its American version. Last fall, Kraft agreed to use natural dyes, including paprika, for its newer mac-and-cheese products, such as its SpongeBob SquarePants meal. The company also promised “to make improvement where we can.”
While some natural-food advocates celebrate Kraft’s shift as a victory, others point out that the original mac-and-cheese, in the iconic blue box, still uses artificial colors — as do a vast array of other processed foods, including soda, crackers, candy, cereal, lasagna, and ice cream.
Because the only purpose of artificial food dyes is cosmetic, health advocates say removing them should be a no-brainer. Governments have been reluctant to get involved, however, especially in the United States, where the FDA has approved nine artificial food colors, mostly derived from petroleum.
In Europe, a warning label has been required since July 2010 on foods that contain certain artificial colors, prompted by the 2007 landmark Southampton Study, in the U.K., which found a link between food dyes and behavioral problems in children.
The upshot? While McDonald’s strawberry sundaes in England are tinted with real strawberries, the American version gets its hue from Red No. 40.
In Europe, the precautionary principle — limiting exposure to possible harm when scientific evidence is inconclusive — is often the law. The FDA, however, operates from an “innocent until proven guilty” standpoint.
In 2011, it held a hearing on artificial food colors, sparking hope among advocates of real food. The agency acknowledged that the dyes may have negative effects on some kids, but since it didn’t find absolute proof that artificial dyes cause hyperactivity, it ruled eight to six that companies could continue using the dyes in foods without warning labels. Many health experts cried foul. They argued that the FDA should adopt the precautionary principle, instead of searching for proof that’s almost impossible to come by without expensive funding for extensive studies.
“The precautionary principle should govern every environmental chemical,” says Bernard Weiss, PhD, University of Rochester, N.Y., professor of environmental medicine. “It applies to drugs: The FDA grants approval for a new drug only after exhaustive screening for adverse effects. That is how the precautionary principle works. With food dyes, to which vastly more individuals are exposed, no such rule applies, which I think is scandalous.”
Jim Stevenson, PhD, an emeritus professor of developmental psychopathology who led the Southampton Study, agrees: “The precautionary principle has to be considered in a cost–benefit context. If there is no benefit from the dyes apart from marketing, then, yes, a higher standard of safety should apply.”

A Public-Health Issue

Additives have been used to color food for hundreds of years — and governments have attempted to regulate the usage nearly as long. In the 1200s, England’s King Edward I decreed that any baker who colored his bread white would be dragged through the streets with the fraudulent loaf hanging around his neck.
Today’s rhetoric about food dyes is much tamer, as is the regulation, and, as a result, exposure is rising. In the past 60 years, in fact, the amount of artificial dye used in food in the United States has increased fivefold.
The first inkling that artificial food dyes have a downside came in the 1970s, when pediatric allergist Ben Feingold asserted that hyperactive kids who eliminated artificial flavors and colors from their diets showed a remarkable improvement in behavior. Since then, other researchers have confirmed that many kids with hyperactivity experience a worsening of symptoms when they consume artificial dyes.
In 2012, a meta-analysis of 24 studies showed that as many as 33 percent of kids with ADHD may benefit from diets free of artificial food colors and additives. Some experts even think that these dyes may push borderline kids over the threshold toward a diagnosis of ADHD in the first place. In other words, they say, some children would not develop ADHD if they weren’t consuming artificially colored foods.
“Parents need to be aware that some children, at the amounts found in everyday kinds of food items, respond with aberrant behaviors,” Weiss says. “Should such behaviors become a common occurrence, parents might undertake a little experiment in order to determine the possibility of a connection.”
Even more alarming, the Southampton Study showed for the first time conclusively and scientifically that artificial food colors and additives can affect the behavior of kids who don’t have any proclivities toward ADHD. Researchers examined the hyperactivity levels of about 300 kids selected from the general population to represent the full range of behavior, from normal to hyperactive. Some kids ate a totally additive-free diet, including additive-free fruit juice, while the rest were given a drink containing artificial food colors and sodium benzoate preservative.
The families weren’t told which drink their kids were getting. Reports from the children’s teachers and parents on the children’s impulsivity, attention, and movement showed that the kids were more hyperactive when they consumed the drinks containing artificial colors and additives.
“That transformed it from an ADHD issue to a public-health issue,” says Gene Arnold, MD, MEd, Ohio State University professor emeritus of psychiatry. The results prompted the European Union (EU) to mandate warning labels on foods and drinks that contain any of the six colors used in the study. (The Southampton team chose to study those six colors because they are commonly found in “children’s food,” but the EU is also currently reassessing all the other artificial food colors it permits.)
The amount of dyes given to children in the Southampton Study was actually well below what many American children consume, according to Laura Stevens, MS, a Purdue nutritional science research associate who studies the link between food dyes and hyperactivity.
While the behavioral effects are most often discussed, artificial food dyes may have adverse physical effects as well, the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) documented through a review of various studies. Some food dyes — including the three most common ones — can provoke hypersensitivity in certain children and adults (see “Dye Job,” below).
Animal studies, meanwhile, have shown a link to other health problems such as reproductive issues and kidney disease. This prompted the European Food Safety Authority to further decrease recommended daily allowances of several artificial dyes and recommend further safety tests.

Putting Pressure on Food Manufacturers

While a federal ban on artificial food colors doesn’t seem imminent, many advocates hope the situation will change as a result of public pressure.
In the same way as big corporations have responded to public demand — McDonald’s now offers local-food choices on its menus, and Walmart has started stocking organic foods —Arnold thinks companies may voluntarily switch to natural dyes if more folks request them. (For more on natural dyes, see “True Colors,” below.)
“Companies might do it for good will, to get ahead of the curve,” he says. “They are responsive to what the public wants. After all, they’re in business to sell things.”
CSPI executive director Michael Jacobson agrees. Public pressure “seems to be the way, unless the FDA wakes up. And we haven’t seen much sign of that,” he says. He adds that although natural colorings are significantly more expensive, they represent, overall, such a “trivial cost of the foods that switching to natural colorings actually shouldn’t affect the price of the food at the store.”
There are profits to be made as well. Vani Hari’s campaign against Kraft brought the issue of dyes such prominence that sales of Annie’s Homegrown boxed mac and cheese — which uses natural annatto extract for color — are up 14 percent over last year. Hari says she wants to continue holding companies accountable: “We were able to shift the marketplace by amassing an army of people who care about what they eat.”
If you’re determined to play it safe and avoid these dyes, there’s good news: The more whole, nutritious, unprocessed foods you eat, the less likely you are to run into artificial dyes.
If a product doesn’t look like it’s from nature, be wary, Hari advises. And always read labels. Avoid anything with terms such as “FD&C Lakes” (a type of dye pigment), “Citrus Red,” or “artificial color.” Some stores have already done the vetting for you: Most natural markets, including co-ops, Whole Foods Markets, and Trader Joe’s, use only natural dyes in their processed foods.
While some food manufacturers protest that natural colors aren’t as vibrant and attractive as artificial colors, Arnold counters that even the possibility of a health risk would merit banning them, since they offer no nutritional value.
Arnold adds that he has also seen firsthand that people adjust quickly to the changing appearance of food. His father made his living selling meat, including “the best wieners in the world,” he says. “But they looked sort of gray instead of red because they didn’t have any artificial color in them. When new people moved to town and were hesitant to buy them, my father would say, ‘Take them home and taste them. I’ll give you your money back if you don’t like them.’ Once they tried them, they came back asking for gray wieners.”
In the end, taste trumps color.
like reading subscription ad

Sheila Mulrooney Eldred is a freelance writer in Minneapolis who often writes about health and fitness.

Connecting ADHD and Nutrition and Artifical Food Additives




Connecting-ADHD-and-Nutrition-2
For kids with focus and behavior challenges, nutritional shifts may work as well as, or better than, medication.
Anyone who’s raised a kid with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) knows the drill: You take your sweet child to nursery school, and he runs amuck during story time. He won’t follow instructions for using the glitter and glue during art. He tips over other kids’ block towers.
Your child might be bright, maybe even brilliant, but he’s on his own disruptive trajectory. He might be called out in class, disinvited from play dates, labeled a menace. He risks exclusion from his community of peers, all because he can’t pay attention, slow down, or fit in.
The teacher takes you aside and tells you that if you don’t get on top of this, your son or daughter won’t be accepted in any mainstream classroom. The teacher gives you the name of a clinic, and you’re on your way.
That’s often the start of the Ritalin years. And from the moment your child takes those stimulant drugs, he never seems quite himself.
On Ritalin, along with Dexedrine, Adderall, or any number of other drugs — eventually one medication stops working, and another must cycle in — he makes it through the day. He’s OK in the classroom, although his personality is eerily flat and contained. He has no appetite and can’t eat lunch.
Then he comes home and the meds wear off, leaving a hellion on the rebound, bouncing off the walls with an aching stomach and a spinning head. If he has a prayer of doing his homework, he’ll need more Ritalin.
Then the meds keep him awake at night, so you have to give him another drug to help him sleep.
It is better than the pre-Ritalin days: He’s not a pariah, shipped off to some gated school for the disruptive, or forced to pass his days shadowed by an aide. At least his grades are better.
Besides, what choice do you have? The school social worker has informed you that taking your kid off his meds now would constitute child abuse — she could report you to the state.
If this scenario sounds familiar, you aren’t alone. ADHD and its cousin, attention deficit disorder (ADD), are the most widely diagnosed neuropsychiatric diseases of childhood. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says that 11 percent of children from age 4 to 17 have been diagnosed with ADHD — boys at more than double the rate of girls. And the majority of them take medicine to control the symptoms.
There is some recent good news: A raft of new, peer-reviewed studies reveals that simple changes in diet can dramatically help manage ADHD and ADD.

A raft of new, peer-reviewed studies reveals that simple changes in diet can dramatically help manage ADHD and ADD.
For a significant set of children, eliminating culprits like artificial food coloring and preservatives, wheat, milk products, and chocolate can vastly relieve symptoms. Still other kids are helped by nutritional supplements targeting certain minerals and vitamins.
The upshot? While there’s no nutritional magic bullet for all children, tweaking your child’s diet to rule out food problems, one by one, just might yield enough improvement that you can toss one or more medications.

Beyond Feingold

The notion that diet could trigger the symptoms of ADHD first emerged in the 1970s, thanks to San Francisco–based pediatric allergist Ben Feingold, MD. His initial mission was testing for allergies by eliminating artificial dyes and other additives in food.
Feingold’s ADHD discovery came about by accident when a woman consulted him about her hives. After testing her for the usual allergies and finding nothing, he decided to run an experiment: Eliminate all natural and artificial food colors and flavors, and see what happens. Within three days the woman’s skin cleared.
Ten days later, Feingold got a call from her psychiatrist: The woman’s aggressive and hostile behavior, which had failed to respond to two years of psychotherapy, had mysteriously vanished as well.
Feingold came to believe that food dyes, preservatives, and even certain chemicals that occur naturally in some fruits, vegetables, and spices were causes of hyperactivity.

Feingold came to believe that food dyes, preservatives, and even certain chemicals that occur naturally in some fruits, vegetables, and spices were causes of hyperactivity.
 
His elimination diet had good results for many children, and psychiatrists, psychologists, and parents began to embrace his ideas.
The food industry quickly jumped into defensive mode. By 1980, studies in hand, health officials declared Feingold’s nutritionally based approach to ADHD purely a placebo response.
The 1990s saw a huge surge in the diagnosis of children thought to be on one psychiatric spectrum or another. In addition to ADHD and ADD kids, there were now the OCD kids (obsessive-compulsive disorder) and the ODD kids (oppositional-defiant disorder).
By 2000, doctors were also reporting a disturbing, inexplicable rise in cases of autism, a range of neurodevelopmental disorders marked by social impairments, communication difficulties, and repetitive patterns of behavior, often accompanied by gastrointestinal ills.
Despite the official decree that Feingold’s approach was bunk, thousands of parents insisted it was working for their spectrum-challenged children.
Feingold pointed to so many problematic substances, however, and there was so much crossover from one neuropsychiatric disorder to the next, separating the diagnoses and triggering factors became a herculean task.

Caustic Colors

The only way to tell whether eliminating a given food or additive might aid a certain disorder is to conduct studies to the highest standards of science. And in recent years, researchers have done just that.
Much of the new clarity comes from Columbia University Medical Center psychiatrist David Schab, MD, MPH. He performed a full meta-analysis — a study of all the studies — to try to tease out the connections between certain additives and symptoms.
Schab’s analysis of placebo-controlled, double-blind studies was published in the Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics in 2004. He revealed that artificial food colors, in particular, had an enormous, negative effect on focus and concentration, driving hyperactive behavior in a significant subset of children and teens.

Artificial food colors, in particular, had an enormous, negative effect on focus and concentration, driving hyperactive behavior in a significant subset of children and teens.
The scientific parsing of this data has made all the difference. While Feingold pointed to thousands of food additives as possibly contributing to the symptoms of ADHD, careful studies have since found that artificial dyes and the preservative sodium benzoate, in particular, trigger the hyperactivity and inattentiveness associated with the condition.
The studies suggest that younger children are more prone to these effects than older children — and that the more exposure to the colors and preservative, the greater the effect.
“Our study showed that the average effect on children’s behavior was distinctly larger than the more widely recognized effect of typical lead exposures on children’s cognition,” says Schab. “Untold billions of dollars have been spent to remove lead from gasoline and paint, but hardly any outcry, attention, or resources have been mobilized to remove artificial dyes from the food supply.”
In the aftermath of Schab’s report came a landmark study from the University of Southampton in England involving nearly 300 children. Strikingly, the study showed that even children without ADHD could be made hyperactive by food additives, while the ADHD children could be made even more hyperactive.
The inattention, impulsivity, and overactivity were literally a pharmacological side effect, as if the children had taken a hazardous drug — and no one was immune. All children, the British researchers concluded, whether initially hyperactive or not, would benefit if the colors and additives were removed.
Then in 2011, Lidy Pelsser, PhD, a researcher at the ADHD Research Centre in the Netherlands, published a paper in the prestigious medical journal The Lancet connecting food sensitivity and ADHD. In her study, Pelsser placed 50 ADHD children on a hypoallergenic diet of water, rice, turkey, lamb, lettuce, carrots, pears, and other whole foods that rarely cause allergic reactions.
Sixty-four percent of ADHD children on Pelsser’s special diet had a significant remission of symptoms. And most of these children relapsed after stopping the elimination diet.
“We think that dietary intervention should be considered [for] all children with ADHD, provided parents are willing to follow a diagnostic restricted-elimination diet for a five-week period, and provided expert supervision is available,” Pelsser says. “Children who react favorably to this diet should be diagnosed with food-induced ADHD.”
Taking it all in, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) convened a panel in 2011 to examine these results. In a highly criticized move, the FDA ultimately voted 8 to 6 against warning labels for the implicated food colorings.
In Europe, meanwhile, a similar panel reviewed the same results and voted for the labeling. Today, many international food makers use only natural dyes in European versions of their products while Americans get artificial colorings in the same food.

Supplement Successes

In addition to dietary changes, there’s evidence that targeted nutritional supplementation might also ease ADHD.
Julia Rucklidge, PhD, of the University of Canterbury in New Zealand, saw numerous teen and adult patients with ADHD symptoms who were highly impaired despite being treated with various drugs and behavioral therapy. She wondered whether their nutritional needs weren’t being adequately met.
In an effort to cover key nutritional requirements and address common deficits, Rucklidge tested a broad-spectrum formula called EMPowerplus. It contains 36 important micronutrients, including 14 vitamins (D, E, H, and a range of Bs), 16 minerals (calcium, iron, magnesium, and zinc, to name a few), and three crucial amino acids (methionine, phen-ylalanine, and glutamine).
In 2008, Rucklidge held an open-label safety trial (in which both clinicians and patients were aware of what was happening) with 14 adults taking the micronutrients for eight weeks. The patients’ ADHD symptoms of hyperactivity, impaired focus, and impulse control improved dramatically.
Other problems were relieved as well: Many participants noted reduced anxiety and stress as well as improved quality of life. And the supplement worked without any of the rebounding, sleeplessness, or jitters that Ritalin and other stimulants often cause.

And the supplement worked without any of the rebounding, sleeplessness, or jitters that Ritalin and other stimulants often cause.
In January 2014, Rucklidge’s team published a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial — run as rigorously, she says, as a pharmaceutical-drug study. Thirty-eight patients received placebos; 42 received the micronutrient mix. ADHD symptoms were monitored by the patient, clinician, and a close observer, such as a spouse or parent.
Here, too, Rucklidge saw success. Those taking the micronutrient formula reported greater improvement in inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. Rucklidge reports that the longer patients remained on the micronutrients, the more profound the effect.
Those who stayed on the micronutrients were still continuing to improve more than one year later. Drugs like Ritalin work better in the beginning, says Rucklidge, but as time goes on, improvement is reduced.
Recently, Rucklidge has reported other interesting findings in her ADHD patients. Just last year, a patient who had experienced improvements with the micronutrient regimen saw setbacks due to a yeast infection. Treatment with olive-leaf extract and probiotics not only cured the yeast infection, but helped the patient regain the ADHD-symptom relief achieved with the micronutrients. Rucklidge believes this suggests that gut health should be considered when treating psychiatric disease.

Progressive Strategies

Such research is still considered  preliminary by mainstream medical standards. But in integrative and functional-medicine circles, elimination diets and nutritional-supplementation strategies have been used for decades to manage the symptoms of ADHD, autism, and allergies.
In his influential book, Healing the New Childhood Epidemics: Autism, ADHD, Asthma, and Allergies, Kenneth Bock, MD, reports that gluten (found in many grains including wheat, barley, and rye) and casein (found in milk and dairy) can sometimes profoundly exacerbate symptoms associated with ADHD.
He’s found that removing gluten and dairy from sensitive children’s diets can yield vast improvements, helping kids become calmer and more focused while improving their health overall.
Bock recommends a clean diet of whole, organic, nutrient-dense foods. Children with ADHD must avoid fish high in heavy metals like mercury, such as tuna, he says, and any meats that have been treated with hormones, pesticides, or herbicides.
He puts some patients on a diet to counteract hypoglycemia (low blood sugar), a condition often caused by inflammation and known to mimic or exacerbate symptoms of ADHD.
“A frequent cause of hypoglycemia is a poor diet too high in [refined] carbohydrates,” Bock notes. Such carbs consist of either sugar or starch, which travel rapidly through the digestive system, sending kids’ behavior on an emotional roller-coaster ride.
His diet consists of low-glycemic-load foods that travel more slowly through the digestive system. It focuses on protein and high fiber, while limiting the intake of grains.
“Grains often contribute to hypoglycemia because they are high in starch,” he explains. Bock advises parents to limit their children’s intake of grains to two or three servings a day, and then, serve them only as a side dish combined with slower-digesting foods high in protein, fat, and fiber.
For kids with ADHD, refined cereals, sweet fruits like melons and raisins, and starches like white rice are best avoided altogether, he says. Beans and lower-glycemic fruits like berries, apples, and pears can be eaten in limited quantities.
Even simple nutritional interventions like these can make a profound difference. But many parents find they get the best results (and support) working with progressive health professionals who can suggest individualized treatment plans.

Bundling Treatments

In addition to nutritional factors, many health experts believe that environmental toxins can also play a significant triggering or exacerbating role for those with symptoms of ADHD or autism. That’s why physicians like Luke Curtis, MD, and Kalpana Patel, MD, advocate for bundling nutritional and environmental interventions together.
In 2007, at an environmental medicine clinic in Buffalo, N.Y., Curtis and Patel conducted a preliminary study of 10 patients diagnosed with ADHD and autism. Working with these children over the course of three to six months, they adjusted a wide range of nutritional and environmental factors.
These included eliminating problematic foods (such as gluten, casein, and food additives); adding more whole foods and supplements (such as probiotics, B vitamins, and omega-3 fatty acids); and reducing the children’s exposure to toxins of all kinds, including mites, mold-causing moisture, tobacco, and pesticides. (For a detailed list, see “Nutritional Tune-Up”, below.)
Attacking all these issues at once proved a successful strategy. Children in the study “showed significant improvement in many areas of social interaction, concentration, writing, language, and behavior,” Curtis reports.
The Buffalo team had no way of being certain about which interventions helped which children. Still, Curtis stands behind the treatment philosophy of addressing all potential irritants simultaneously.
“Until we know more, the bundling approach appears to be the best use of the environmental-medicine arsenal,” he says.

The Way Forward

One thing is certain: More work must be done to determine how both the presence and absence of various nutrients and chemicals may be affecting our children’s health and well-being.
There are thousands of chemical compounds in our foods, and still more in our water, air, soil, and everyday environments. At the same time, there are dozens of nutritional components that might affect ADHD symptoms for better or worse.

“When it comes to food and attention, what we consume can make a difference — an enormous one.”
Combined, all these factors can dramatically influence our children’s cognition, behavior, and life chances.
Until we know more, supplementing with broad-spectrum nutrients, as Rucklidge does, and eliminating problematic foods, as Pelsser recommends, may be the surest nutritional interventions for ADD and ADHD.
Most of these findings are still new and require replication, notes Columbia University’s David Schab.
In the meantime, he notes, “When it comes to food and attention, what we consume can make a difference — an enormous one.”

12 big ideas that are shifting the way we think about health.

Game Changers



Game-Changers
12 big ideas that are shifting the way we think about health.
For more than a decade, Experience Life has covered the cutting edge of health and nutrition. We’ve tracked emerging trends and reported on promising research. Our central focus has been on lifestyle medicine, and recent advances in this field have been nothing short of astonishing. We’ve never had such a clear understanding of how powerfully factors like food, activity, sleep, stress, and environment affect our health. Here are what we see as some of the most important concepts we’ve covered over the past few years — and why we think they’ll continue to matter. Want to know more? Check out the links to our original articles, which offer deeper analysis, references, and sources for further reading. — The Editors

1. Friendly Fat

Most of us were raised to fear fat. We were steered toward lean cuts of meat, egg-white omelets, and dry toast. For a while there, many of us even avoided nuts, seeds, and avocados — afraid their relatively high fat and calorie content would contribute to weight gain.
Yet, a growing body of research shows that virtually all fats in their natural form — including the saturated fat found in butter, eggs, and red meat — can help build healthy metabolism and support key biochemical processes, including optimal cell, nerve, and brain function.
Our collective fear of fat started in the 1940s with physiologist Ancel Keys. Based on some flawed research, he hypothesized that dietary fat lay at the root of cardio-vascular disease. The U.S. government quickly codified Keys’s recommendations into nutritional guidelines.
The prepared-food industry, which saw a huge opportunity, rushed into the marketplace with an array of processed, low-fat products. Most were high in refined carbs, which have now been proven to fuel both inflammation and obesity. For this reason, many experts today see the war on fat as the primary driver of our current obesity and chronic-disease epidemic.
For the last half-century, we’ve been encouraged to think about weight gain as a simple math equation: More calories in minus fewer calories out equals calories stored as fat.

For the last half-century, we’ve been encouraged to think about weight gain as a simple math equation: More calories in minus fewer calories out equals calories stored as fat.
But this weight-loss advice has failed, primarily because it doesn’t take into consideration the hormonal and metabolic impact of different foods, explains researcher David Ludwig, MD, a Harvard Medical School professor and head of the New Balance Foundation Obesity Prevention Center at Boston Children’s Hospital.
“That approach will work for short periods of time, but people almost always gain the weight back because other mechanisms kick in,” says Ludwig, who is currently heading up a $13.6 million study on overweight and obese college students.
Ludwig and other researchers are now experimenting with higher-fat, low-glycemic, whole-food eating programs they think might offer new promise for many, including those who have struggled with their weight for a lifetime. (For more on the importance of healthy fats, see “Overcoming Grain Brain”.)
For more on the big fat myth, see “A Big Fat Mistake.”

2. Microbiome Matters

We are each a veritable ship of microbes, and without their help, we’d be sunk. This thriving ecosystem that each of our bodies hosts — referred to collectively as our microbiome — is made up of 100 trillion bacteria, viruses, fungi, and protozoa. They outnumber our human cells 10 to one.
Not so long ago, we thought most of these microbes were hostile invaders we needed to destroy. Now, researchers tell us we need plenty of these bugs, and in the right balance, for optimal health.
A thriving microbiome supplies us with critical nutrients, helps us fight dangerous pathogens, keeps our immune system in balance, and modulates our weight and metabolism by extracting energy and calories from the food we eat.
Both helpful and potentially harmful microbes are found throughout our bodies, including on our skin and in our noses, mouths, tonsils, lungs, guts, and genital tracts.
The diversity and density of species that compose the human microbiome vary from person to person, depending on factors like diet, geographic location, and medical history. Even the experience of our ancestors plays a role: Microbiome patterns are passed down from parents to children over centuries.

The diversity and density of species that compose the human microbiome vary from person to person, depending on factors like diet, geographic location, and medical history.
“This understanding of the microbiome has changed my whole way of thinking,” says Robert Rountree, MD, a functional-medicine specialist in Boulder, Colo. “Our gut is like a garden. If you have an overgrowth of fungus in your garden and things aren’t growing right, you can’t just blast it with things that will sterilize the soil, as we used to routinely do to the body with antibiotics and other medicines. There are all kinds of things you need to do to get the soil healthy again.”
Imbalances in our gut microbiome can result in a wide range of health concerns, like obesity, colitis, asthma, and mental illness. Rountree says that most of these problems take years or decades to develop. They then require protracted treatment, including changes in diet and lifestyle; the use of probiotics (beneficial bacteria); and, in some cases, pharmaceutical and nutriceutical medications.
Another novel intervention: fecal transplants. Yes, doctors are now transplanting poop from healthy individuals to people with conditions like Clostridium difficile, an infectious bacterial disease that causes serious conditions such as chronic diarrhea and potentially fatal gut inflammation. C. diff., as it’s known for short, has traditionally been highly resistant to treatment, but fecal transplants that repopulate the gut with healthy flora are amazingly effective.
“The cure rate with these fecal transplants is around 90 percent,” Rountree says. “There is not another intervention in medicine with that kind of success ratio.”
For more on the microbiome, see “Your Microbiome: The Ecosystem Inside.”

3. Gluten Avoidance

Gluten-free eating has become so common and so trendy that it’s prompted a popular backlash, inviting jokes from late-night TV hosts, skepticism from family and friends, and even a “pro-gluten” movement of sorts. While it may be tempting to think of “GF” as a passing fad, a growing number of progressive health experts predict it is here to stay. And with good reason.
Gluten is a protein found in many grains, including wheat, rye, barley, spelt, Kamut, and triticale. One in 100 people has an autoimmune disorder called celiac disease, in which gluten prompts the body to attack the small intestine.
But researchers think that another 30 to 40 percent of Americans may have non-celiac gluten sensitivity. For these folks, eating gluten sets off a chain of inflammation that can lead to an array of disorders.

 One in 100 people has an autoimmune disorder called celiac disease, in which gluten prompts the body to attack the small intestine.
A 2009 report in the Journal of the American Medical Association found an increased risk of death, mostly from heart disease and cancer, among both groups — 39 percent higher for those with celiac and 35 percent higher for people with latent celiac disease.
The best way to determine whether your health problems — reflux, arthritis, chronic fatigue, and others — are connected to gluten is to remove it completely from your diet for two to four weeks and see if your symptoms improve.
For more on gluten, see “Gluten: The Whole Story.”

4. 21st-Century Medicine

One of the greatest flaws of conventional medicine is that it often focuses on resolving symptoms rather than addressing the root causes of disease. Enter functional medicine, a systems-biology approach born within the ranks of conventional medicine more than 20 years ago.
“Functional medicine is focused on addressing the cause of chronic illness rather than its effects,” says Jeffrey Bland, PhD, founder of the Institute for Functional Medicine (IFM) and author of The Disease Delusion. “Conventional medicine evaluates each organ in isolation, but we look at how they communicate and interact with each other.”
Conventional medicine typically uses drugs to combat the symptoms of chronic illness and slow its progression. But because these drugs are developed without a systems perspective, they typically cause side effects. Doctors may then prescribe new drugs to deal with the side effects, and soon patients are dealing with the spiraling health consequences of multiple drugs and their interactions.
In contrast, functional practitioners take careful patient histories and examine the patient’s biochemistry, genetics, and environmental exposures to look for the cause of a medical issue or cluster of symptoms. While they sometimes use pharmaceuticals and other conventional interventions, they typically rely more heavily on diet modification and supplementation, detoxification, stress management, exercise, and other lifestyle adjustments.
Since 1991, the IFM has trained more than 100,000 doctors, nurses, chiropractors, nutritionists, and specialists in many areas, including oncology and gastroenterology, and its membership is expanding by 30 percent annually.
This past September, the world-renowned Cleveland Clinic opened a center for functional-medicine in collaboration with IFM.
“There’s so much more visibility now for this approach that works and provides real value to patients,” Bland says. “We’re really going to see some extraordinary changes in the way we reduce the burden of chronic illness.”
For more on functional medicine, see “Functional Medicine: A Science Whose Time Has Come.”

5. Ancestral Eats

Our hunter-gatherer ancestors would have a hard time recognizing much of what we modern humans call food. And that’s not just true of highly processed “junk” fare.
Even before the dawn of industrial food, 10,000 years of agriculture introduced foods such as grains, dairy, legumes, sugar, and alcohol — substances to which earlier humans had not previously been widely exposed.
This disconnect between our ancient genes and modern diet and lifestyle, say advocates of Paleolithic eating, goes a long way toward explaining the health plagues of contemporary civilization, including obesity, heart disease, type 2 diabetes, autoimmune disease, and more.
Accordingly, fast-growing trends toward “caveman cuisine” emphasize foods available in our pre-agricultural past (grassfed or wild meats, edible greens and other vegetables, roots, mushrooms, nuts, and some seasonal fruit), while minimizing reliance on more modern dietary additions, especially processed sugars and gluten-containing grains.
For more on the paleo diet, see “Paleo Vs. Vegan.

6. Soil-Quality Concerns

The food we eat is only as healthy as the soil in which it grows. Or as microbiologist Elaine Ingham, PhD, puts it: “Human health and soil health are one and the same.”
Healthy, well-managed dirt is naturally fertile, free of dangerous toxins, and full of microorganisms and nutrients that carry on a synergetic partnership with plants — and with us.
Over the past two decades, there has been growing interest in evaluating the impacts of conventional industrial agricultural practices on soil health and erosion, and a growing awareness of the role nutrient-depleted soils may play in the declining nutrient density of some types of produce.

Healthy, well-managed dirt is naturally fertile, free of dangerous toxins, and full of microorganisms and nutrients that carry on a synergetic partnership with plants — and with us.
Today, more farmers are employing organic and biodynamic techniques to rebuild and protect soil health. Still, the vast majority of American farming relies on chemical fertilizers, pesticides, monocropping, and genetically modified organisms (GMOs), all of which tend to degrade soil quality and may pose threats to human health.
Need another reason to start caring about dirt? Vital soil also helps sequester excess carbon in our atmosphere — potentially playing a significant supporting role in resolving climate change.
For more on healing the soil, seeGood Earth” and “Why Dirt Matters.

7. Autism Redefined

Autism was once a rarely reported disorder. Today, some form of autism-spectrum disorder afflicts nearly one in 68 children. Once believed to be a psychosocial phenomenon related to parenting factors, autism is now thought to be the result of inflammatory, gastrointestinal, mitochondrial, nutritional, and immune problems that manifest in dysfunctions of the body and brain.
While researchers are still puzzling out the disease pathways, many health professionals are now exploring a variety of chronic and environmentally triggered health conditions to which children with autism may be especially vulnerable, due in part to specific genetic variations. Treatments focused on resolving these underlying health challenges are offering new promise.
For more on autism, see “Autism’s Puzzle.

8. Meditation Matters

For centuries, meditation was associated with monks on mountaintops. Now it’s being recognized as a practical intervention that can help us all improve our health and happiness.
Research suggests that meditation helps moderate and retrain the body’s fight-or-flight stress response. When unmanaged, that response triggers the release of a cascade of pro-inflammatory chemicals, including cortisol and adrenaline. It also disrupts important bodily digestive and immune processes, and it has a variety of negative downstream effects, including irritating and damaging tissue, depressing mood, and driving food cravings.
A daily meditation practice, recent studies show, can trigger positive cellular and neurological transformations, thereby improving your overall health and happiness quotient. Researchers are even working with the U.S. Marine Corps to evaluate meditation’s effects on combat stress and its possibilities for helping posttraumatic stress disorder.

A daily meditation practice, recent studies show, can trigger positive cellular and neurological transformations, thereby improving your overall health and happiness quotient.
Meditation expert and physician Jamie Lauren Zimmerman, MD, notes that the Latin root for “meditation” and “medicine” is the same — mederi, which means “to heal.” Zimmerman, a member of the ABC News medical unit, is currently involved with a variety of mindfulness-in-school programs. She’d like to see such programs spread, in part because she asserts they could contribute to our collective well-being. “I believe these children would be prepared to not only lead happier, healthier lives,” she explains, “but they would also be poised to treat others more kindly and make a greater contribution to society.”
For more on meditation, see “Learning To Sit Still.

9. The Autoimmune Epidemic

The incidence of autoimmune disorders (including such conditions as type 1 diabetes, multiple sclerosis, celiac disease, psoriasis, and asthma) has increased dramatically over the last 50 years. They are now sickening nearly as many people as cancer and heart disease. And they often prove challenging for conventional medicine to resolve.
One of the top experts on autoimmunity is Alessio Fasano, MD, the director of the Center for Celiac Research and Treatment at Massachusetts General Hospital for Children in Boston. He explains that these diseases generally have three components: genetic predisposition, an environmental trigger, and a leaky gut.
A growing number of practitioners now recognize that gastrointestinal systems weakened by poor nutrition, food sensitivities, stress, and toxins can spring leaks that allow various nasties (undigested food particles, bacteria, viruses, pollutants, and more) to cross the intestinal barrier into the bloodstream. The immune system then goes into overdrive and, over time, winds up destroying healthy tissue.
Quieting an overactive immune system generally requires a multipronged approach, but since 70 percent of the cells of the human immune system reside in the gut, many progres-sive health pros are increasingly focusing their attention there first.
For more on autoimmune disorders, see “Autoimmune Disorders: When Your Body Turns on You.

10. Ibuprofen Awareness

When we start popping over-the-counter painkillers for chronic issues, we’re setting ourselves up for a world of hurt.
Every year, some 100,000 people are hospitalized in the United States with gastrointestinal bleeding from taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as ibuprofen (including the brands Advil and Motrin), naproxen (often branded as Aleve), or aspirin. Some 16,500 of those hospitalized die.
Excessive NSAID use may also cause a range of health problems, such as leaky gut, renal and cardiac damage, joint deterioration, and improper healing of broken bones.
Acetaminophen, the active ingredient in Tylenol, is not an NSAID, but overdoses of the medication are the leading cause of acute liver failure in the United States.
The takeaway: It’s OK to use these powerful medications in moderation for the occasional headache or short-term injury, but it’s best to deal with chronic pain and inflammation by getting to the root of the matter.
For more on NSAIDs, see “This Is Your Body On Ibuprofen.

11. The Healing Power of Sleep

Because sleep is the time our bodies repair and rebalance themselves, any deficit can wreak havoc, compromising our immune systems, causing inflammation, hormonal imbalance and weight gain, and even messing with our genes.
University of Chicago sleep researcher David Gozal, MD, explains that sleep problems can cause a surge of pro-inflammatory molecules throughout the body, contributing to problems like memory loss, sexual dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, even Alzheimer’s. For this reason, the field of sleep medicine is fast expanding, and good sleep habits are increasingly seen as essential to a healthy lifestyle.
For more on sleep, see “The Healing Power of Sleep.

12. Electrosmog Exposure

Some researchers and public-health advocates are expressing increasing concern about the potential health impacts of electromagnetic frequencies (EMFs). While electromagnetic radiation exists in nature, we’re currently exposed to as much as 100 million times more than our grandparents were, says Ann Louise Gittleman, PhD, author of Zapped. We get it via cell phones, computers, appliances, cell towers, smart meters, and even solar panels.
Recent studies have linked electromagnetic frequencies — especially those from cell phones carried close to our bodies — to brain tumors, damaged DNA, fertility problems, and autism. In 2011, the World Health Organization declared cell phones a possible carcinogen. A group of independent scientists and health experts from around the world cataloged the risks and recommended safety steps in Bioinitiative 2012.
“Powerful industrial entities have a vested interest in leading the public to believe that EMF and RFR, which we cannot see, taste, or touch, are harmless,” notes Harvard Medical School pediatric neurologist Martha Herbert, PhD, MD. But, “cell towers can exert a disorganizing effect on the ability to learn and remember, and can also be destabilizing to immune and metabolic function.”
While more research on this topic is required, we predict that it’s one area many health-seekers will be watching with interest.